Mundaka 1.1.4 Trans & Comms

Tasmai sa hovāca dve vidye veditavye iti ha sma. Yad brahmavido vadanti parā caivāparā ca. (1.1.4)

tasmai – to him (Śaunaka); saḥ – he (Aṅgiras); uvāca – said; brahmavidaḥ – those who know Veda; vadanti – declare; iti – that; dve vidye – there are two types of knowledge; ha sma – indeed; veditavye – to be gained; yad – which (are known as); parā ca eva – higher; aparā ca – lower

Aṅgiras said to Śaunaka: ‘Those who know the Veda say that there are indeed two types of knowledge to be gained, which are (known as) higher and lower.

Instead of directly answering the question and unfolding parā-vidyā, the teacher starts with the statement that you also have to know aparā-vidyā. It is because of an important rule that Śaṅkara cites[34] here: a teacher has to first present all prevalent erroneous notions and negate them.

~Dayananda

4. To him (Śaunaka) Aṅgirā said, “There are two kinds of knowledge to be acquired, namely, aparā and parā – lower and higher. So say those (the great seers of the Upaniṣads) who know Brahman.”

According to Śaṅkara, the implication of the very question directly demands such an answer. The question concealed in its words not only indicates a thirst to know what that supreme Knowledge is, but also expresses at once a doubt in the mind of the student as to whether there can be such a ‘Knowledge’. The import of the question is: ‘O Teacher! Is there a Knowledge, knowing which all other knowledges become known, and if there be such a Knowledge, in what way is it different from the ordinary knowledges known to us and and how can I attain it?’

~Chinmayananda

To him he said: Two kinds of knowledge must be known-that is what the knowers of Brahman tell us. They are the Higher Knowledge and the lower knowledge.

The lower knowledge is the knowledge of the phenomenal world. In reality it is ignorance, for it does not lead to the Highest Good. The seer of the Upanishad asks the aspirant to acquire both the knowledge of the relative world and the Knowledge of Ultimate Reality. \Vhen by the pursuit of the former he fails to attain true freedom and immortality, he cultivates the latter.

~Nikhilananda